Predictable
January 19, 2010
Well, my agent got back to me and said she didn't like it, didn't feel it was at the same level as my other work (which I disagree with).
So....
Beats me. I'm not pissed. I just had to roll my eyes, because I have yet to show her an incomplete work she liked.
I do know this. I've got 6-8 weeks to write a very long market research report that's getting off to a slow start. I've got a nonfiction book manuscript to finish by the end of April that's only 20-25% completed, if that. I've got miscellaneous other writing things to deal with.
So maybe I'll focus on paying gigs and set aside writing fiction on spec for a while. Or not.
Oh, and if you didn't visit the provocative agent blog post, you should.
posted by Mark Terry at 9:56 AM
6 Comments:
That sucks ...
But you're right: the very long, provocative agent post is definitely worth reading.
Well, I did debate sending it to her simply because I knew there was a chance she wouldn't like it.
Really? Aw, bummer, I'm sorry. Maybe you shouldn't send her anything incomplete, and if she doesn't like it then, then find another agent for that project.
But then you said she didn't like China Fire, so I'm naturally inclined to disagree with her. And naturally, I think I'm right. ;-)
Aw, sorry, Mark. Sometimes turning our attention to other projects lets the right one float to the top of the brain, though.
I liked the Provocative Post. I agreed with some of it, disagreed with other parts.
Eric,
That's at least partly why I don't think being in a critique group would work well for me, because I find the actual writing part to be a fairly delicate process that can get run off the rails pretty easily. There's a lot to be said about trusting to your gut and just keepin' on.
Mark:
That does suck.
But I do disagree about the crit group, only because if you spend the hours and put in the time . . . you're bringing a chapter or so a week/meeting, versus 180 pages all at once, and there is time to absorb and shape. Although it requires, definitely, an open mindset and a particular approach, I suppose. We all find what works for us.
ANYWAY . . . maybe it can be salvaged?
E
Post a Comment
<< Home